Thursday, January 30, 2020
Meaning of meme an eipiphiny Essay Example for Free
Meaning of meme an eipiphiny Essay The word mehme means; m-meaning, e-emotional, h-humanistic, m- methodical e- experience. It is a rhyme of ââ¬Ëmemeââ¬â¢. On the other hand, that worked ââ¬ËEipiphinyââ¬â¢ is corrupted from the word ââ¬Ëepiphanyââ¬â¢. Epiphany means (a) ââ¬Ëa sudden manifestation or perception of the essential nature or meaning of somethingââ¬â¢ (b) ââ¬Ëan intuitive grasp of reality through an event usually simple and strikingââ¬â¢,ââ¬â¢ an illuminating discovery, realization or disclosureââ¬â¢ (c) ââ¬Ëa revealing scene or momentââ¬â¢ Eipiphiny represents ââ¬Ëstochastic / mathematical epiphany. ââ¬â¢ Its components are mathematical constants, ââ¬Ëeââ¬â¢, ââ¬Ëpiââ¬â¢, ââ¬Ëphiââ¬â¢ and non- existent number ââ¬ËIââ¬â¢ which if not discovered the world today may be non-existant. ââ¬Ëeââ¬â¢ and ââ¬ËIââ¬â¢, represent ââ¬Ëemotional intelligenceââ¬â¢, which is of importance when discussing our mission. (Richard, 1990) The kind of cultural value changes that would be necessary for this evolution of value memes to occur may be having nothing to do with meme. Cultural change is all about being dynamic to meet the changing demands of society. The ability to learn new tricks will enhance cultural change. It will assist us appreciate each others culture and be accommodative of new ideas technological advancement, change of styles and fashion, new economic trends as well. Meme may not be practical in the modern world. A good environment of acquire, ideas is where an individual is not tied down to unimportant procedures but where he is left to pursue what they are motivated to do. To fit in the changing world, it is mandatory to keep abreast with the latest in technology and set realistic and achievable goals or aims. KOZOLââ¬â¢S ââ¬ËSAVAGE INEQUALITIESââ¬â¢ The book ââ¬ËSavage Inequalitiesââ¬â¢ was written in 1991 by Kozol Jonathan. The book talks about education gaps between institutions or schools where different classes and races exist. His views are based on observations he made in the system of public schools of Washington D. C. , Camden, Chicago and New York City. These observations were taken in school, which have the lowest spending (per capital) on student and those which have highest spending. Kozol has given some factors, which have contributed to poor education system for instance lack of basic tools for teaching, understaffed environment, congestion and poor sanitation. The worst hit is the minorities who are usually allocated the lowest budgets annually. This is done without considering that the people who live in extreme poverty with school district are taxed highly. Cited in his book, are the cases, which are filed against such poor schools. The districts affected are Jersey City, Camden, Orange and Irvington. The judges no longer adhere to the law of state but instead they side with concerned locals and children. Kozol also compares the present conditions that minorities are supposed to learn in. There are other historical cases that he mentions whereby the results are not just system of funds in terms of taxation and distribution. Another serious problem mentioned in his book is racial segregation in the education system of America. This problem is heightened by the inequalities, which are obvious in the distribution of funds, which are collected via property taxes. Some historical cases are Plessy vs Fergusson and Board of Education vs Brown, Bradley vs. , Miliken and Rodriguez, vs. , San Antonio. The poor education system has been in America for too long and yet only the minorities are affected. The length of time within which these policies have been practiced has made it to become part of their education system,. To some extent, this form of system can be related to ââ¬Ëmemeââ¬â¢. The Oxford English dictionary describes it as a self-replicating element of culture, passed on by imitationââ¬â¢. Going by this definition we can conclude that the poor education system has replicated itself over time and has become part of their culture. JOHATHAH KOZOL Kozol, was born on 5th September 1936 in Massachusetts Boston. He is an educator, a non-fiction writer and activist. He is well known for books on public education in U. S. Kozol graduated in 1954 in Greenough and in 1958 at Harvard University with English Literature degree. Kozol received Rhodes scholarship to join Magdalon College. For some reasons, he could not complete the leadership since he traveled to Paris because he wanted to start writing a novel,. It took Kozol four years writing ââ¬ËThe Fume of Poppiesââ¬â¢, a fiction book. Jonathan has also held 2 Guggenheim Fellowship and has been a Rockefeller foundation Fellow. He has also been involved in social psychology field. Currently he is on the Editorial Board of Greater Good Magazine. Kozol has been very active in propagating for public education that is fully integrated in the U.S He has never ceased to condemn education inequalities and has spoken unrelentingly regarding segregation of Hispanic and black children from children by the white in public schools which are segregated. Jonathanââ¬â¢s argues form an ethical point of view and he makes heavy comparisons between poor schools and rich schools. Particularly, he makes an analysis of the money that is spent on each child. He discovers that per child spending annually is very high, that is, they pay a figure that is slightly above $20,000 every year for every child in a district. His question is whether it is fair that a personââ¬â¢s place of birth should be a determinant on a personââ¬â¢s quality of education. He has shown deep commitment towards improvement of American public schools and has therefore founded and is in charge of a non-profit Education Action. His group is devoted to organize teachers all over the country who may be interested to push back Supreme Court decisions against NCLB, and assist in making an excellent, single and unified system in all public schools in America. (Jonathan, 1992). Dawkins has used ââ¬Ëmemeââ¬â¢ to signify a cultural entity, for example an idea, a song or religion that can be considered as a replicator by an observer. In his hypothesis, he indicated that it was possible for people to look at numerous cultural entities as copiers or replicators. They generally make copies via exposure to human beings, who evolved efficiently though not perfectly in terms of behaviour and information. It is not common for memes to be perfectly copied. They might become combined, refined or modified with different ideas, which results to other new memes. The new memes may prove to be efficient in replicating than those that preceded them. This provides a framework for cultural evolution hypothesis, which is analogous to biological evolution of genes. CRITICISMS OF DAWKINS THEORY (SOCIOCULTURAL) The contemporarily sociocultural evolution has rejected a big part of ââ¬Ëclassical social evolutionââ¬â¢. This is due to a number of theoretical setbacks. Firstly, the theory was believed to be ethnocentric (makes heavy judgments on various societies, and favours western civilization. Secondly it made a general assumption that all cultures must have same goals and must also progress the same way. Thirdly his theory-equated materials culture for example, cities and technologies with civilization. Fourthly, it also equated fitness/progress with evolution. This was based on gross misunderstanding of theory evolution. Lastly, the evidence produced contradicts the theory. Many primitive societies are believed to be more democratic, peaceful and equitable as compared to many contemporary societies. They are also regarded as healthier in terms of ecology and diet. The social evolution is classified as a science theory. It has been used to give support to unjust social practices believed to be racist especially slavery, colonialism and unbalanced conditions of economy which are present in the industrialized Europe. Darwinism social theory is very much criticized since it was responsible for some philosophies, which were used by Nazis. (Jonathan, 1992). EFFECTS OF EVOLUTIONARY THEORY The thought of evolution has brought about considerable social effects. With the development of scientific theories, most explanations have displaced some alternatives, which have been widely held. Since evolution theory includes explanations of origins of humanity, it has great impact on the societies of humans. (Jobson, 1998) Evolution of culture has punctuated equilibrium, which was developed by Gould and Eldredge for evolution that is biological. According to Bloomfield, most human societies have equilibrium, which is punctuated. This would first mean a society, which is stable and a transition, which results to a stable society that is more complex. The human society status is pegged on food production productivity. Deevey reported that food productivity does not change much of stable societies but it increases during transitions. CONCLUSION Some scholars have harshly criticized Dawkinââ¬â¢s theory of ââ¬Ëselfish Genesââ¬â¢. His theory is being described as absurd and it is even more difficult for a person to know where to begin criticizing his concept. The idea that the idea of selfish gene is discredited however is foolish, since his concept has received a lot of acknowledgement on its anniversary 30 years after its publication. We might be hoping too much that a person has the ability to come up with an argument touching on our lives or say something that proves he has an understanding of the framework of the selfish gene. We can only take his explanation for it. Rmj, brought forward some arguments against The Selfish Gene. He argues that Dawkins lacks understanding of religion, philosophy of religion and theology. In his book, Dawkins does not refer to any religion philosopher. This generally shows his deliberate ignorance of his topic. Other people have strongly supported the ââ¬Ëselfish gene theoryââ¬â¢. An Indian Bay states that we basically are selfish. We would not survive if we were not selfish. It is selfishness that gives us the desire to survive. The truth is genes could be selfish but human beings have gradually evolved to become social. Currently, Darwinianââ¬â¢s view incorporates an understanding and states cooperation are part and parcel of the genetic heritage. REFERENCES Jonathan, K (1992) Savage Inequalities: Children in Americaââ¬â¢s schools, Harper Perennial Library, US. Jonathan, K (1982) Alternative schools: A guide for Educators and parents, Harper Perennial Library, U. S. Jobson, C (1998) Our Genes Excel Publishers, Canada. Richard, D(1990) The selfish Gene, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. US.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.